Aseptic Processing Excellence: Environmental Control under 21 CFR 211

Posted: September 9, 2023

Aseptic Processing Excellence: Environmental Control under 21 CFR 211

In the pharmaceutical manufacturing arena, precision and sterility are non-negotiable. Maintaining drug purity and efficacy is a fundamental requirement, and this is where aseptic processing plays a crucial role. Our focus in this blog is on the pivotal aspect of environmental control under 21 CFR Part 211 within aseptic processing.

We’ll cut through the complexity to explore aseptic processing, its historical evolution, and the regulatory framework, particularly FDA regulations, all with a specific emphasis on environmental controls. This blog aims to provide a clear understanding of how stringent environmental control measures are central to pharmaceutical excellence.

Table of Contents

What is Aseptic Processing?

The production of sterile drug products can be achieved through two primary methods: aseptic processing and terminal sterilization. Aseptic processing is a method used to produce sterile drug products by preventing microbial contamination throughout the entire manufacturing process. This is typically applied to drugs that cannot withstand the high temperatures or other stresses of terminal sterilization.

Terminal sterilization, also known as sterilization in place, is a method used to produce sterile drug products by exposing them to a lethal process (e.g., heat, radiation) after the product is sealed in its final container. This method is typically applied to drug products that can withstand the sterilization process.

Aseptic processing is a method used to produce sterile drug products by preventing microbial contamination throughout the entire manufacturing process.

Aseptic processing is what is the focus of this blog post. Aseptic processing involves the following key steps:

– Creating a controlled and sterile environment, often in a cleanroom or isolator, where all components, equipment, and personnel are meticulously sterilized or sanitized.

– Using sterile materials, such as containers, closures, and filters.

– Maintaining strict aseptic techniques to handle, mix, and fill drug products without introducing contamination.

– Regularly monitoring and testing the environment and product for microbial contamination.

Aseptic processing is commonly used for producing biologics, vaccines, certain antibiotics, and other sensitive drug products. It’s especially suitable for products that cannot undergo terminal sterilization due to heat or stability concerns.

Aseptic processing occurs within controlled environments known as cleanrooms or clean zones. These environments are meticulously designed to minimize airborne particles, control temperature and humidity, and provide positive air pressure to keep contaminants out. In this blog we are going to focus on this controlled environment aspect of aseptic processing.

FDA Regulations and Guidance for Aseptic Processing in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Aseptic drug manufacturing in the United States is governed by several FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) regulations and guidelines that ensure the sterility, safety, and quality of pharmaceutical products. Some of the key FDA regulations and guidance documents related to aseptic drug manufacturing include:

21 CFR Part 210: This regulation is a section of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21 that contains regulations established by the pertaining to Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) in the manufacturing, processing, packing, and holding of pharmaceutical products in the United States. These regulations are essential for ensuring the quality, safety, and efficacy of pharmaceutical products, including both prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs.

21 CFR Part 211 – Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals: This regulation sets out the cGMP requirements for pharmaceutical manufacturing, including aseptic processing. It covers facility design, environmental monitoring, personnel training, quality control testing, and record-keeping to ensure the sterility and quality of aseptically manufactured drugs.

21 CFR Part 211 contains explicit regulatory requirements pertaining to environmental controls within an aseptic manufacturing facility. These regulations outline the necessary measures and standards that must be adhered to in order to maintain a sterile and contamination-free environment during pharmaceutical production

Learn more indept information about 21 CFR 211 by taking our e-learning course 21 CFR 211: cGMP for Finished Pharmaceuticals 

21 CFR Part 600-680 – Biological Products: These regulations provide specific requirements for the manufacturing of biological drug products, including vaccines, blood and blood components, and cellular therapies. They address aspects of aseptic processing for these products.

Guidance for Industry: Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing – Current Good Manufacturing Practice: This FDA guidance document provides detailed recommendations on aseptic processing, including facility design, validation, environmental monitoring, and process control. This guidance contains detailed regulatory requirements specifically related to environmental controls within an aseptic manufacturing facility.

Guidance for Industry: Process Validation: General Principles and Practices: This guidance outlines the general principles and practices of process validation, which is critical for aseptic manufacturing.

Guidance for Industry: Container Closure Systems for Packaging Human Drugs and Biologics: This guidance addresses the requirements for container closure systems used in aseptic drug manufacturing to ensure product sterility and stability.

Guidance for Industry: Quality Systems Approach to Pharmaceutical Current Good Manufacturing Practice Regulations: This guidance emphasizes the importance of a quality systems approach in meeting cGMP requirements, including those for aseptic processing.

These regulations and guidance documents collectively establish the framework for aseptic drug manufacturing in the United States. Pharmaceutical manufacturers must comply with these regulations to ensure the safety and efficacy of aseptically manufactured drugs and to meet FDA standards for quality and sterility. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in regulatory actions, including product recalls and facility inspections.

The History of Aseptic Processing in the Pharmaceutical Industry

The history of aseptic processing in the pharmaceutical industry is marked by a gradual understanding of its importance, driven by unfortunate historical incidents and advances in microbiology. Here is an overview of key milestones and notable incidents:

Early 19th Century: Before the concept of aseptic processing, pharmaceutical products were often prepared and dispensed by pharmacists in non-sterile conditions. Contamination was common, but its link to disease transmission was not fully understood at this time.

1850s – 1860s: Ignaz Semmelweis, a Hungarian physician, observed a significant reduction in maternal mortality rates when medical professionals practiced handwashing with chlorinated lime solutions. Although he did not connect this to microbial contamination, his work laid the foundation for hygiene practices.

Late 19th Century: The germ theory of disease, developed by Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch, established the connection between microorganisms and disease. This breakthrough highlighted the importance of sterile techniques.

1890s – Early 20th Century: The emergence of injectable drugs and vaccines required more rigorous aseptic practices. The development of sealed ampoules and vials marked a step toward safer drug administration.

1930s: The tragic case of the Elixir Sulfanilamide disaster in the United States highlighted the consequences of inadequate safety testing and aseptic processing. Over 100 people died after consuming a toxic drug formulation.

1940s – 1950s: The discovery of antibiotics and vaccines led to heightened awareness of the importance of aseptic processing. Development of sterile filtration techniques and advancements in cleanroom technology improved pharmaceutical manufacturing.

1960s – 1970s: Regulatory agencies, including the FDA in the United States, introduced more stringent regulations regarding aseptic processing and sterile manufacturing. The development of isolators and laminar flow hoods enhanced environmental control.

1980s – 1990s: High-profile cases, such as the contamination of L-tryptophan supplements in the late 1980s, underscored the importance of aseptic processing. Regulatory requirements continued to evolve to ensure product safety.

21st Century: Advancements in technology, including real-time environmental monitoring, have improved aseptic processing. Biopharmaceuticals, cell therapies, and gene therapies require increasingly sophisticated aseptic techniques.

Throughout history, tragic incidents and scientific discoveries have driven the pharmaceutical industry toward a better understanding of the critical role of aseptic processing. Lessons learned from disasters like the Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy and modern advancements in microbiology have shaped the industry’s commitment to rigorous aseptic techniques and regulatory compliance. Today, aseptic processing is a cornerstone of pharmaceutical manufacturing, ensuring the safety and efficacy of medications worldwide.

Environmental Control and Aseptic Processing Environments

Environmental control refers to the management and maintenance of specific environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity, cleanliness, and air quality, within the manufacturing facility. These conditions are carefully controlled to prevent contamination and ensure the integrity of pharmaceutical products.

Environmental control refers to the management and maintenance of specific environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity, cleanliness, and air quality, within the manufacturing facility.

Here are some key reasons why environmental control is essential in such settings:

Contamination Prevention: Aseptic manufacturing processes require a sterile environment to prevent contamination of pharmaceutical products. Contaminants, such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, or particles, can compromise the safety and efficacy of medications. Environmental control measures, such as high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration systems and controlled airflow, help maintain a clean and sterile environment.

Product Quality: Environmental control directly affects product quality. Deviations from specified environmental conditions can lead to variations in product quality, stability, and shelf life. Maintaining consistent conditions ensures that each batch of pharmaceuticals meets regulatory standards and performs as intended.

Regulatory Compliance: Pharmaceutical manufacturing is highly regulated by agencies like the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). These agencies have strict guidelines for environmental control in aseptic manufacturing facilities. Compliance with these regulations is essential to obtain and maintain manufacturing licenses and approvals.

Patient Safety: Pharmaceutical products are administered to patients for various medical conditions. Any contamination or deviation from quality standards could harm patients. Proper environmental control is crucial to minimize the risk of adverse effects and ensure patient safety.

Batch-to-Batch Consistency: Consistency in environmental conditions helps maintain batch-to-batch consistency in pharmaceutical production. This is essential for producing pharmaceuticals with predictable and reliable effects.

Cost Efficiency: Environmental control measures may require significant investments in infrastructure and technology. However, these investments can lead to cost savings in the long run by reducing the likelihood of product recalls, rejected batches, and regulatory fines.

In summary, environmental control in aseptic pharmaceutical manufacturing refers to the careful management of environmental conditions to prevent contamination, ensure product quality, comply with regulations, and safeguard patient safety. It is a critical aspect of pharmaceutical manufacturing that directly impacts the safety, effectiveness, and success of pharmaceutical products and the companies that produce them.

21 CFR Part 211 and its Role in Environmental Control in Aseptic Processing Environments

21 CFR Part 211 contains specific requirements relating to environmental controls.

For example in subpart C the section of the regulation that covers Building and Facilities cGMP requirements it addresses the requirements for proper ventilation and equipment to control air quality, pressure, humidity, and temperature when making drugs. Air filtration systems, including pre-filters and particulate matter filters, must be used when necessary, and dust recirculation should be controlled. Adequate exhaust systems are necessary in areas prone to air contamination during drug production. Additionally, when manufacturing penicillin drugs, the air-handling systems must be entirely separate from those used for other human drugs to prevent cross-contamination and ensure product safety.

Here is the section form Subpart C of 21 CFR 211 that relates to this aspect of environmental control:

Subpart C – Buildings and Facilities

§ 211.46 Ventilation, air filtration, air heating and cooling.

“Adequate ventilation shall be provided.

(b) Equipment for adequate control over air pressure, micro-organisms, dust, humidity, and temperature shall be provided when appropriate for the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of a drug product.

(c) Air filtration systems, including prefilters and particulate matter air filters, shall be used when appropriate on air supplies to production areas. If air is recirculated to production areas, measures shall be taken to control recirculation of dust from production. In areas where air contamination occurs during production, there shall be adequate exhaust systems or other systems adequate to control contaminants.

(d) Air-handling systems for the manufacture, processing, and packing of penicillin shall be completely separate from those for other drug products for human use.”

21 CFR 211

Learn more indept information about Subpart C by taking our e-learning course cGMP 21 CFR Part 211 Subpart C – Buildings and Facilities Online Training Course

In the upcoming sections of this blog, we will examine specific facets of environmental control and their corresponding sections within 21 CFR 211. While I won’t be explicitly referencing the FDA guidances related to these aspects, I encourage you to refer to the provided list of guidances for further insights and guidance on these topics.

Environmental Control in Aseptic Areas: Cleanroom Environments

A cleanroom environment is a highly controlled and regulated space within a facility, that is designed to maintain extremely low levels of airborne particles, contaminants, and microorganisms. Cleanrooms are classified into different classes or grades based on the cleanliness level required for their specific applications. These classifications are defined by standards organizations like ISO and the U.S. Federal Standard 209E (now superseded by ISO 14644). The classification determines the maximum allowable particle count for a given cleanroom.

While 21 CFR 211 may not explicitly mention cleanrooms, it does emphasize the need for appropriate facilities, equipment, and controls to ensure the quality and purity of pharmaceutical products. This can include the use of cleanrooms and controlled environments when necessary to meet these quality and safety standards

The definition of cleanliness, according to the international cleanroom standard, ISO 14644-1 is (ISO 14644-1, 2015): “A room with control of particulates and set environmental parameters. Construction and use of the room is in a manner to minimise the generation and retention of particles. The classification is set by the cleanliness of the air.


Key characteristics of a cleanroom environment include:

Strict Air Quality Control: Cleanrooms control air quality by using advanced filtration systems, including HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filters, to remove particles from the air. The number and size of particles allowed per cubic meter are defined by international cleanliness standards, such as ISO 14644.

Temperature and Humidity Control: Cleanrooms maintain precise temperature and humidity levels to ensure product quality and process consistency. These conditions are often tailored to the specific requirements of the industry.

Positive or Negative Pressure: Cleanrooms are designed with controlled air pressure differentials to prevent the entry of outside contaminants. For example, some cleanrooms maintain higher pressure than adjacent areas to keep contaminants out, while others have lower pressure to ensure contaminants stay contained within the cleanroom.

Specialized Garments: Personnel working in cleanrooms typically wear specialized garments, including cleanroom suits, gloves, and head covers, to minimize the introduction of contaminants from their clothing and bodies.

Controlled Access: Access to cleanrooms is restricted and controlled to prevent unauthorized personnel from entering. Personnel often pass through airlocks, gowning rooms, and undergo air showers or decontamination procedures before entering the cleanroom.

Stringent Cleaning Protocols: Regular cleaning and decontamination of surfaces and equipment within the cleanroom are essential to maintain cleanliness and sterility.

Cleanrooms are classified into different classes or grades based on the cleanliness level required for their specific applications.

Environmental Control in Aseptic Areas: Temperature Control

Temperature is a critically important element of the environmental control aspect of aseptic drug processing environments for several reasons:

Microbial Control: Temperature control is essential for preventing microbial growth and contamination. Maintaining a specific temperature range inhibits the proliferation of microorganisms that could compromise the sterility of the drug manufacturing process.

Product Stability: Many pharmaceutical products are sensitive to temperature variations. Deviations from the recommended temperature range can impact the stability and efficacy of drugs. Temperature control helps ensure that the final product meets quality and safety standards.

Temp control

21 CFR 211 mandates that aseptic areas maintain controlled temperature levels to prevent deviations that could compromise product sterility. It can be seen here in Subpart C , Section 211.42 10 (ii). 

Subpart C – Buildings and Facilities

Sec. 211.42 Design and construction features.

“…(c) Operations shall be performed within specifically defined areas of adequate size. There shall be separate or defined areas or such other control systems for the firm’s operations as are necessary to prevent contamination or mixups during the course of the following procedures:

…(10) Aseptic processing, which includes as appropriate:

(i) Floors, walls, and ceilings of smooth, hard surfaces that are easily cleanable;

(ii) Temperature and humidity controls;

(iii) An air supply filtered through high-efficiency particulate air filters under positive pressure, regardless of whether flow is laminar or nonlaminar;

(iv) A system for monitoring environmental conditions;

(v) A system for cleaning and disinfecting the room and equipment to produce aseptic conditions;

(vi) A system for maintaining any equipment used to control the aseptic conditions.”

21 CFR 211

Temperature is closely monitored and controlled to ensure that it remains within specified limits. Here’s how temperature is typically monitored and controlled in such environments:

Temperature monitoring methods include:

Temperature Sensors: Temperature sensors, such as thermocouples, resistance temperature detectors (RTDs), or thermistors, are strategically placed throughout the processing area. These sensors continuously measure the temperature at critical points.

Data Loggers: Data loggers equipped with temperature sensors are often used to record temperature data continuously. These devices can be placed in various locations within cleanrooms and processing areas to provide a comprehensive view of temperature conditions.

Control Room Displays: The data from temperature sensors and data loggers are typically displayed on control room monitors, allowing operators to monitor temperature conditions in real-time. Alarm systems may be integrated to alert operators if temperature deviates from the acceptable range.

Temperature control methods include:

HVAC Systems: Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems play a crucial role in temperature control. These systems are designed to maintain the desired temperature range within cleanrooms and processing areas. They may include heaters, coolers, and humidifiers or dehumidifiers to regulate temperature and humidity.

Control Algorithms: Temperature control systems use control algorithms to adjust heating or cooling based on the feedback from temperature sensors. These algorithms ensure that the temperature remains within the specified range.

Validation: Temperature control systems are subject to validation to ensure they perform as intended. This involves testing the system under various conditions to verify that it can consistently maintain the required temperature range.

Emergency Backup Systems: Aseptic processing facilities often have backup systems in case the primary HVAC or temperature control system fails. These backup systems can help maintain temperature stability in critical areas.

Temperature Mapping: Temperature mapping involves the systematic testing and mapping of temperature conditions throughout the facility. This ensures that temperature is uniform across the processing area and meets regulatory requirements.

Documentation: All temperature monitoring and control data are documented as part of the facility’s record-keeping procedures. This documentation is crucial for regulatory compliance and audits.

Calibration: Regular calibration of temperature sensors and control systems is essential to ensure accuracy. Calibrations are typically performed using standard reference materials or calibration equipment.

Regulatory Compliance: Pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities must comply with regulatory requirements for temperature control, as outlined in regulations like 21 CFR Part 211. These regulations set standards for temperature control in drug manufacturing.

Learn more indept information about Subpart D by taking our e-learning course 21 CFR Part 211 Subpart D – Equipment Online Training Course

Environmental Control in Aseptic Areas: Relative Humidity Control

Relative humidity (RH) is the ratio of the amount of water vapor present in the air to the maximum amount of water vapor the air can hold at a specific temperature and pressure, expressed as a percentage.

In aseptic drug processing and pharmaceutical manufacturing environments,  RH is the term that is more relevant to environmental control. Relative humidity is a critical parameter to monitor and control in these settings because it directly affects the moisture content of the air and, consequently, the potential for microbial growth and contamination.

Relative humidity (RH) is the ratio of the amount of water vapor present in the air to the maximum amount of water vapor the air can hold at a specific temperature and pressure, expressed as a percentage.

In section 211.42 of 21 CFR 211, as we saw previously, it  states that “(c) Operations shall be performed within specifically defined areas of adequate size. There shall be separate or defined areas or such other control systems for the firm’s operations as are necessary to prevent contamination or mixups during the course of the following procedures … 10(ii) (ii) Temperature and humidity controls

Relative humidity

Maintaining the appropriate relative humidity level is essential for several reasons:

Sterility Maintenance: Relative humidity influences the moisture content in the air, and excessively dry or excessively humid conditions can affect the sterility of the environment. Controlling RH helps prevent the growth and dispersion of microorganisms, which is crucial in aseptic processing.

Product Quality: RH can impact the quality and stability of pharmaceutical products, especially those in solid dosage forms. Maintaining the correct RH helps ensure product integrity.

Equipment Performance: Some pharmaceutical manufacturing equipment, such as tablet presses and coating machines, can be sensitive to variations in humidity. Maintaining consistent RH levels helps ensure the reliable operation of these machines.

RH Monitoring Methods:

Monitoring RH in an aseptic drug processing environment is crucial for maintaining the desired environmental conditions. The monitoring process typically involves using specialized instruments and equipment designed to measure and record RH accurately. Here’s how RH is typically monitored in such environments:

Hygrometers: Hygrometers are instruments specifically designed to measure relative humidity. There are various types of hygrometers available, including:

Psychrometers: Psychrometers use a wet and dry bulb thermometer to determine relative humidity. The rate of evaporation from the wet bulb compared to the dry bulb is used to calculate RH.

Capacitive or Resistive Sensors: Modern hygrometers often employ capacitive or resistive sensors to measure RH. These sensors change their electrical properties based on the moisture content in the air, providing a digital readout of RH.

Data Loggers: Data loggers equipped with RH sensors are commonly used for continuous monitoring and recording of environmental conditions. They can be placed at critical locations within the aseptic processing area, such as cleanrooms, to track RH over time.

Control Systems: In automated pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities, RH monitoring is integrated into the overall control system. Control systems can adjust heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain RH within the specified range.

Calibration: Regular calibration of RH monitoring instruments is essential to ensure accuracy. Calibrations are typically performed using standard reference materials or calibration equipment to verify that the RH measurements are reliable.

Alarm Systems: Many aseptic drug processing environments have alarm systems in place to alert personnel if RH deviates from the acceptable range. This allows for immediate corrective action to be taken if RH falls outside the specified limits.

Documentation: All RH monitoring data should be documented as part of the facility’s record-keeping procedures. This documentation helps demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements and can be valuable for investigations and audits.

Validation: The monitoring systems and procedures for RH should undergo validation to ensure they are accurate, reliable, and meet regulatory requirements. Validation includes testing and documenting the performance of the monitoring equipment under various conditions.

In aseptic drug processing environments, maintaining the appropriate relative humidity is crucial to prevent contamination and ensure product quality. Therefore, accurate and reliable monitoring of RH is an integral part of environmental control efforts in these facilities.

Environmental Control in Aseptic Areas: Maintenance of Pressure Differentials between Rooms with varying Classifications

The maintenance of pressure differentials between rooms with varying classifications in an aseptic drug processing environment refers to the intentional control of air pressure levels to create zones of different cleanliness or sterility within a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility. This control is achieved by maintaining specific pressure differentials between adjacent rooms or areas, each with its own classification based on cleanliness requirements.

The maintenance of pressure differentials between rooms with varying classifications, such as cleanrooms, is not explicitly mentioned in 21 CFR 211. However, the regulation does require pharmaceutical manufacturers to have adequate controls and procedures in place to prevent contamination and to ensure the quality and purity of their products.

In a pharmaceutical facility, cleanrooms are often classified based on their cleanliness level, such as ISO Class 5 (highest cleanliness) to ISO Class 9 (lower cleanliness). Positive pressure is maintained in the cleanest areas (e.g., ISO Class 5) relative to adjacent spaces. This means that air flows out of these cleanrooms into less clean areas, preventing contaminants from entering. For example, a sterile filling room (ISO Class 5) may have positive pressure relative to a gowning area (ISO Class 7).

Some areas, like those for the handling of hazardous materials or potent compounds, are required to have negative pressure relative to surrounding spaces. This prevents airborne contaminants from escaping into clean areas. For instance, a containment suite for handling toxic chemicals may have negative pressure compared to adjacent non-contaminated spaces.

Transition spaces, called airlocks, are often used to maintain pressure differentials between clean and less clean areas. Workers pass through a series of interconnected rooms, each with controlled pressure levels. For example, a pharmaceutical facility might have an airlock system leading from a non-sterile manufacturing area to a sterile filling room to prevent contamination during entry.

Maintaining appropriate pressure differentials between cleanrooms or between cleanrooms and surrounding areas is an important aspect of controlling contamination in pharmaceutical manufacturing, especially when dealing with sterile products or products with specific environmental requirements. These requirements are typically covered in more detail in industry standards and guidelines, such as those published by the ISO, particularly ISO 14644 for cleanrooms and controlled environments.

While 21 CFR 211 doesn’t provide specific details about pressure differentials, it does emphasize the importance of having appropriate facilities, equipment, and controls in place to prevent contamination and ensure product quality. Compliance with industry standards and guidelines related to cleanroom design and operation is typically expected to meet these regulatory objectives. Manufacturers are responsible for establishing and following their own procedures and controls that are consistent with industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Environmental Control in Aseptic Areas: HEPA Filtration

HEPA filtration, which stands for “High Efficiency Particulate Air” filtration, is a type of air filtration system that is highly efficient at capturing and removing airborne particles, including dust, allergens, microorganisms, and other contaminants. HEPA filters are known for their ability to provide exceptionally clean and purified air by trapping particles as they pass through the filter.

In Subpart C of 21 CFR 211, section 211.42 (iii) ” An air supply filtered through high-efficiency particulate air filters under positive pressure, regardless of whether flow is laminar or nonlaminar;”

This regulation mandates the use of HEPA filters in aseptic processing areas to maintain the quality and sterility of pharmaceutical products. The requirement ensures that the air supplied to these areas is filtered through HEPA filters and maintained at a positive pressure relative to the surrounding areas to prevent contamination. HEPA filtration is a critical component of ensuring the cleanliness and sterility of aseptic processing environments in pharmaceutical manufacturing.

Key characteristics and features of HEPA filtration include:

High Filtration Efficiency: HEPA filters are designed to capture particles as small as 0.3 micrometers (microns) with an efficiency rating of 99.97% or higher. This high efficiency makes them effective at removing a wide range of airborne contaminants.

Particle Retention: HEPA filters use a combination of mechanical and diffusion-based mechanisms to capture particles. Larger particles are trapped by the filter fibers through direct interception, while smaller particles are captured through diffusion as they collide with gas molecules within the filter.

Airflow and Pressure Drop: HEPA filters are designed to allow adequate airflow while maintaining their filtration efficiency. However, as particles accumulate on the filter surface, the pressure drop across the filter may increase, necessitating periodic replacement or cleaning.

Applications: HEPA filters are widely used in environments where air quality and cleanliness are critical, including pharmaceutical cleanrooms, hospitals, laboratories, manufacturing facilities, clean air cabinets, and residential air purifiers.

Sterility and Contamination Control: In pharmaceutical manufacturing and aseptic processing environments, HEPA filters are essential for maintaining sterile conditions by removing airborne contaminants and microorganisms. This helps prevent contamination of pharmaceutical products.

Worker Safety: HEPA filtration systems are used to protect workers from inhaling harmful airborne particles, especially in industries dealing with hazardous materials or environments.

Maintenance: HEPA filters require regular maintenance, including periodic replacement or cleaning, to ensure optimal performance.

Cleanroom airflow

The Important Relationship between Environmental Control and Environmental Monitoring

Environmental monitoring and environmental control play separate yet interconnected roles in regulated environments. Environmental control encompasses deliberate design measures aimed at establishing and maintaining environments within defined operational parameters. In contrast, environmental monitoring serves as a valuable complement to these control measures, involving systematic observation and measurement of environmental conditions and potential contaminants. This monitoring is crucial for detecting any deviations from established control parameters. When considering risk management, it is judicious to concentrate monitoring efforts strategically, prioritizing areas where environmental control measures may be most susceptible.

In essence, while environmental control focuses on establishing and maintaining ideal environmental conditions, environmental monitoring serves as a crucial tool for detecting and addressing any deviations. Together, they form a robust system for ensuring the integrity of controlled environments, especially in regulated industries such as pharmaceuticals.”

Environmental Monitoring

Environmental Monitoring: Real-Time Vigilance – 21 CFR 211.42(c)(10)(iv)

21 CFR 211.42(c)(10)(iv) addresses environmental monitoring, specifying that the facility must have adequate procedures to prevent microbial contamination of drug products. It states that “Aseptic processing, which includes as appropriate ….a “Temperature and humidity controls” .

Any deviation from acceptable levels triggers immediate corrective actions to rectify the situation and prevent product contamination. This regulation directly correlates with the real-time environmental monitoring practices employed to detect and prevent microbial contamination within cleanrooms. Any deviation from acceptable microbial levels triggers corrective actions, in accordance with this regulatory requirement.

FDA Guidance or Industry: Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing — Current Good Manufacturing Practice

Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing — Current Good Manufacturing Practice, is a guidance document issued by the FDA. The Aseptic Processing Guidance places significant emphasis on environmental control within aseptic drug manufacturing facilities. It outlines the need for robust environmental monitoring programs (EMP) to ensure the cleanliness and sterility of the manufacturing environment. It states the follwoing: 

In section x, A, 1 of the guidance document Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing — Current Good Manufacturing Practice, it states: 

“In aseptic processing, one of the most important laboratory controls is the environmental monitoring program. This program provides meaningful information on the quality of the aseptic processing environment (e.g., when a given batch is being manufactured) as well as environmental trends of ancillary clean areas. Environmental monitoring should promptly identify potential routes of contamination, allowing for implementation of corrections before product contamination occurs (211.42 and 211.113).”

Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing — Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Section X Laboratory Controls .A.1 

FDA Inspections: Warning Letter Citations for Environmental Control Noncompliances

Regulatory agencies like the FDA play a crucial role in ensuring compliance with 21 CFR 211. They conduct regular audits and inspections of pharmaceutical facilities to assess compliance with environmental control and aseptic processing standards. FDA audits and inspections involve a thorough review of a pharmaceutical facility’s operations, records, and processes related to aseptic processing and environmental control. Inspectors assess the facility’s adherence to established standards, including facility design, equipment maintenance, personnel training, and environmental monitoring.

Below are three examples of FDA Warning Letters, citing deviations related to aseptic environmental control activities. 

Warning Letter Example #1. In a Warning Letter (2023) MARCS-CMS 655666  
to the company Iso-Tex Diagnostics, Inc., the US regulatory authority FDA found a deviation where “You failed to ensure that your facility is designed, controlled, and maintained to prevent lower quality air from entering and contaminating your aseptic processing cleanrooms, resulting in departures from your established limits throughout your clean rooms. For example:……”

Warning Letter Example #2. In a Warning Letter (2022) MARCS-CMS 644180 
to the company Nephron Pharmaceuticals Corporation dba Nephron Sterile Compounding Center, LLC, the US regulatory authority FDA found a deviation where “Your firm failed to establish an adequate system for monitoring environmental conditions in aseptic processing areas (21 CFR 211.42(c)(10)(iv)).”

Warning Letter Example #3. In a Warning Letter (2020) MARCS-CMS 611664 
to the company Family Pharmacy of Statesville, Inc., the US regulatory authority FDA found a deviation where “…Your firm failed to use appropriate air filtration systems for production areas (21 CFR 211.46(c)).”

As we’ve seen in the real-world examples of Warning Letters issued by the FDA, deviations related to environmental control can have serious consequences. These deviations, as cited in Warning Letters, underscore the need for pharmaceutical companies to remain vigilant in their efforts to comply with environmental control and aseptic processing requirements.


In conclusion, this blog has provided a thorough exploration of aseptic processing, with a specific focus on the pivotal role of environmental controls in pharmaceutical manufacturing. We’ve delved into the details of cleanroom environments, temperature and humidity control, pressure differentials, and HEPA filtration, all of which are crucial to maintaining sterility in drug production.

As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, so too must our commitment to stringent environmental controls. By prioritizing these controls, we ensure the ongoing production of safe and effective sterile drug products, meeting the highest standards of quality and safety in the industry.

Struggling with your GMP training? Contact us today for expert guidance and support!

Sign up to our Newsletter
Stay up to date with our latest news by subscribing to The Learning Reservoir’s newsletter! As a subscriber, you’ll receive exclusive access to our latest blog posts, expert insights, and updates on our latest courses and training programs. Plus, you’ll be the first to hear about our special offers and promotions. Don’t miss out on this valuable resource – sign up today!

    You can request the removal of your details at any time by clicking the link in the footer of the emails or by emailing us at


    Picture of Dr. Fiona Masterson

    Dr. Fiona Masterson

    With over 25 years’ experience in quality management, operations management,
    and higher education, Fiona combines technical expertise with highly engaging
    training. She has worked in fast-paced manufacturing environments including
    medical device companies, and lectures part-time in universities.
    She is a lead quality auditor and managed the CAPA programme of a leading
    medical device company.
    She has Bachelor and Master of Science degrees, and a Doctorate in
    Mechanical Engineering. Fiona has published in peer reviewed journals on
    topics such as medical device and pharmaceutical regulatory affairs, on-the job
    training and innovative training technologies and strategies. .